Will County Public Works & Transportation Committee met Feb. 1.
Here are the minutes provided by the committee:
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLIGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Ms. Newquist led the Pledge to the Flag
III. ROLL CALL
Chair Joe VanDuyne called the meeting to order at 9:02 AM
| Attendee Name | Title | Status | Arrived |
| Joe VanDuyne | Chair | Present | |
| Sherry Newquist | Vice Chair | Present | |
| Herbert Brooks Jr. | Member | Present | |
| Mica Freeman | Member | Present | |
| Donald Gould | Member | Present | |
| Jim Moustis | Member | Present | |
| Frankie Pretzel | Member | Present | |
| Tom Weigel | Member | Present | |
| Denise E. Winfrey | Member | Present |
Present from the State's Attorney's Office: C. Wise
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Public Works & Transportation Committee Executive Session Minutes Nov 2, 2021
| RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mica Freeman, Member SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
| RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mica Freeman, Tom Weigel AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
| RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member SECONDER: Herbert Brooks Jr., Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
1. Presentation on License Plate Reading Cameras
(Flock Safety)
Mr. Van Duyne stated there has been discussion and maybe some opinions on Flock Safety License Plate Reading Cameras, and maybe possibly some misinformation. So, I wanted to invite Flock Safety here and the manufacture of the camera itself to just state some facts, and to try to clarify information for the committee. I believe we have Baily Quintrell here with us this morning.
Mr. Quintrell said I represent Flock Safety this morning; I will answer any questions, I believe Mr. Ronaldson was going to start us off with a few facts first.
Mr. Van Dyne replied thank you; let’s turn this over to Mr. Ronaldson.
Mr. Ronaldson said License Plate Readers; let’s start off with a couple of facts from the County and then as Mr. Quintrell mentioned he’ll go into a brief description of what the system is. We have invited Mokena Police Chief Scott Koerner to speak as well to describe the history of their use with this system. As we mentioned the committee can ask questions of the group. As far as the County, we have entered into nine IGA’s with municipalities throughout the county over the last fourteen months since this has been ongoing. First, was Frankfort, and then the second was the Village of Mokena, they have had this for over a year. Will County DOT had permit applications for at least 31 isolated installations throughout our system. The IGA’s as they are written are good for three years before they need to be renewed. Each municipality is required to apply to the Illinois State Archives Records Management Section to establish a specific records plan; and provide evidence of certification prior to us issuing those permits. This is the real quick stance of where Will County DOT is at on the cameras. With that I will turn it over to Mr. Quintrell to describe the system and remind the committee exactly what it is we are talking about.
Mr. Quintrell stated I am going to give you a two-minute overview and then handle any questions. My role at Flock Safety is VP of External Affairs; we started Flock about four years ago in Atlanta GA, I have since gone across the country, and it was in response to an increase in crime in our hometown in Atlanta. The local police told us license plates offer objective evidence they are very helpful, and we looked at what was out there. The technology for reading license plates and capturing images of cars was expensive so we developed technology ourselves that utilizes cellular connections for data and solar panels and built a system that was effective for local law enforcement. Fast-forward to now, we’ve been in Illinois for several years; we work with about 1,500 municipalities across the country. A little over 60 municipalities in Illinois and several municipalities in Will County; we’re fortunate to continue to help them fight crime. The way we help a local law enforcement agency fight crime is really by capturing objective evidence on roads. There is an FBI statistic that around 75% of crime is committed using a vehicle; so, vehicle related evidence is very often useful. Our cameras are on the side of the road capturing a picture of every car that drives by, we identify the characters in the license plate, the state of the license plate, and a few details of the car like the color and the make. Then that information helps solve crime in two ways; the first we compare the license plate against a national list of known stolen vehicles, known stolen license plates, and known cars associated with felony warrants. Then they generate a real time alert to local law enforcement; and say this stolen car has just entered your community. It gives a heads up to local law enforcement. Often stolen cars are used to commit other crimes, so, it is a way of preventing crimes before they can occur when we can find and locate that stolen vehicle. That is one good example; another way we help solve crime is let’s say a crime occurs there is a surveillance camera, or a witness and they say we saw a white truck speed off after they ran out of the bank for example. A law enforcement agency they have cameras in that municipality will go look and will search based on the vehicle’s description; they will often find a picture of that car and see the license plate; that is going to lead to see who the registered owner is. That person may or may not have been associated with the crime and that kind of gives them the first lead in solving a crime. That is the two main ways that we help law enforcement agencies solve crime. The collected data is stored for 30 days and then it’s deleted. Our customer the law enforcement agency owns the data. We built the system, installed the cameras, write the software, but the data is the property of our customer, and the entire system is built and designed for solving crime. That is kind of a high-level description. I’m happy to go into more detail or answer any questions.
Mr. Ronaldson said before we do that if Police Chief Koerner could speak on their usage of the system.
Chief Koerner said I would just like to point out some things from my law enforcement standpoint. We have approximately 8,000 cars that go through our cameras on Monee/Manhattan Rd. everyday. Nearly 3 million cars are expected to cross the Manhattan/Monee Rd. at I-57 on an annual basis. At this point we have had just a little bit over 200 Flock hits on 8,000 cars per day, which comes down to an average of 1 per day. Those hits have included homicide suspect, aggravated vehicle high jacking suspects, armed robberies, identity thefts, and probably 40% of the other ones are stolen vehicles. When you talk about a stolen vehicle you are usually talking about something that is being utilized for other crimes. Stolen vehicles today are not like they used to be where they go to the chop shop, or they get on a train and go to Mexico. While they still do that the majority of them are used by other criminal elements to commit violent crimes. This is a big benefit to us obviously, there are controls on it, it is an alert system we are alerted when these vehicles go through our LPR (License Plate Recognition). We are not able to monitor regular traffic, so, I have no idea when Judy Ogalla comes through Monee. We are also restricted by LEAD (Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion) and the Secretary of State on how and when we run plates. So, there are restrictions and controls on this; this is for law enforcement. I think that when you look at one per day and as I have said in previous meetings here; I’m a little bit of a privacy nut myself. I don’t want everybody in the world know how many kids that I have, what I drive, and where I live. Yet everywhere we go whether it’s the restaurant, a gas station, or retail center they’ve got a picture of us as soon as we walk in the door. There are five Ring Doorbells every five blocks so the monitoring situation on a LPR is much more minimal that what you are seeing everyday every place else. We don’t monitor every plate that goes through; we only research. It has helped us solve a couple of identity thefts, and an armed robbery by entering vehicle information into the system and being able to identify the car, the plate, and the driver. This is an excellent law enforcement tool. It is unfortunate that we are in a world where everything is monitored, and everybody is watched; but I think the LPR is more minimal way than most others. In all honestly that cell phone that you are carrying is probably the biggest monitor you have. It is going to tell everybody in the world if they want to know where you are at and what you are doing. I hope that I made my point that this LPR is a very valuable law enforcement tool and is not something that is easily abused. You would have to jump through some hoops to gain information as to where your ex-girlfriend is. Hopefully, this gives you some insight to what we are dealing with and the benefits and controls that we have on it.
Mr. Ronaldson said thank you Chief Koerner; Chair Van Duyne if you want to take it back over for questions.
Mr. Van Duyne said thank you both gentleman for giving those brief explanations. I think it may help our committee make future decisions. Does anyone have any questions for either gentleman?
Ms. Newquist asked if you are going to access this data other than the monitoring system if you are actively looking for a car for whatever reason. How often does that happen, and do you need a warrant for that? I’m just curious; I am in favor of this of technology generally.
Chief Koerner said I wouldn’t say that we utilize it a great deal; we are obviously not a bigger community. Anytime that we have a criminal act where we can identify a vehicle or a description of a vehicle; then we’ll use a search tool and a certain time element to see if we can get a license plate on it. Because it is an open-air camera it is a public street, and we are looking at something that is open for everyone to see; we don’t need a warrant to access that search feature on the LPR camera.
Ms. Freeman said I would like to clarify; I go down a road and a picture is taken of my car as long as I haven’t gotten on a registry that I am a bad guy then I’m okay; and you are just going to be holding that for 30 days unless you need to run something to get the bad guy. Am I correct with that?
Chief Koerner replied yes, in a basic form that’s pretty much correct. It monitors and absorbs every vehicle that goes through. Unless the vehicle is listed in our computers as being wanted, or we are looking for that vehicle it will never be noticed.
Ms. Freeman asked then after 30 days it is wiped out and I am good to go again, right?
Chief Koerner replied correct.
Ms. Freeman said I am for this technology too; because I have heard that it has stopped several people from getting away with, or out of our county from doing bad things. I think that is a good thing.
Mr. Pretzel said I paid close attention to the debate on this, and I appreciate all the concerns of privacy. I have had a lot of people reach out to me about this; and ask why we would support this it is an invasion of our privacy. I think it is important to remind the Board that we are not voting on whether we should have cameras or not; we are voting on an IGA. These municipalities have already debated this, they have already approved it, and they are just asking us if they can use our poles or our land to continue the efforts that they have already started in the municipalities. So, I just think that’s important to remind everybody; we are not debating on the cameras, we’re just debating on if we want to allow them to use our space or not. I will continue to support this; I think it is a great tool for all the reasons that everybody has already mentioned. I just want to make the Board aware what it is that we are voting on.
Mr. Van Duyne said that is a great point Mr. Pretzel; thank you for that.
Mrs. Ogalla said I just want to thank Chief Koerner for attending the meeting and let everyone know how it is being used within in the Village of Monee which is in my district. We do have so many vehicles on and off I-57 at Monee/Manhattan or are just traveling through just because of the logistics of where Monee is situated. We do have quite a few truck stops there so you can imagine that has to be some potential for all different types of activities that could not be beneficial to the community. This helps keep the Village of Monee safer than if we didn’t have those. I am glad we are able offer them the ability to use those cameras on our public right of way. Another thing to think about is if somebody were to go missing; their license plate could be put in and they could look back for this to see if that person happens to travel through that area during a specific time; because they would have been traveling through before anyone knew that they were missing. That is a positive you are not looking for a criminal you are looking for someone who went missing for whatever reason, so that would be a benefit. I appreciate that you had this presentation Mr. Van Duyne to help clarify some concerns that some Board members have regarding the use of this. While we are voting to allow them to use our public right of way with an IGA and municipalities have given our approval still supports the fact that we do support using these cameras and the reasons why we do support it.
Mr. Van Duyne said and that’s why we invited those folks this morning; a lot of the issues that we vote on are unanimous so this one seemed to be a little contentious. I thought it was a good idea to revisit. Mr. Moustis, I see you have your hand up.
Mr. Moustis said I was going to say something similar about we’re just letting them use our right of way to locate the cameras on. I also want to mention we have done this for several municipalities before. We have pretty much set the precedent as a Board to allow to use our right of way for these types of cameras. I would hope that we don’t have to go through this every single time a municipality comes up. I see they are going to install 100’s of cameras on the Dan Ryan; thank God maybe it will reduce the shootings on the Dan Ryan. I think this is something that the general public supports. People are very concerned about crime coming through their community; I am supportive of a crime fighting mechanism that I think is overall beneficial to the public. I understand abuse and individual rights. We tend to see on the news when someone in law enforcement maybe goes the wrong direction; but that is certainly not the majority of law enforcement. I fully support this.
Mr. Brooks said if I was in church, I would say amen to Mr. Pretzel and Mr. Moustis. We have 37 cities and villages that touches Will County; anything we can do with an IGA to make those villages safer I’ll be 100% for it. I have never looked at cameras as a government overreach. I have always looked at it as electronic eyes where human eyes cannot be. I do support the previous comments in that anytime one of our villages come to us to make their villages safer I am 100% for it and I thank you so much.
Mr. Van Duyne asked if any Commissioner have another comment or question before we move on? I see none; thank you everybody for showing up this morning and keep up the good work.
| RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS] Next: 2/17/2022 9:30 AM
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member SECONDER: Herbert Brooks Jr., Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
(Jeff Ronaldson)
Mr. Van Duyne stated Mr. Ronaldson adopting the Will County ITS Opportunities Plan.
Mr. Ronaldson stated as mentioned last month when we put on the agenda the ITS Plan; there are government documents on there we provided to you to kind of peruse, they are large documents. We thought we would come back this month and have a presentation by our consultant to explain a little more of what it is before we move it forward for a vote at the County Board. As you can see from the large documents there’s been a lot of work that has gone into this since late 2019 when we started the process. A lot of agencies were consulted; and a lot of time has been put into this. With us today I have my Project Manager Christina Kupkowski; she works in my office. We also have representatives from AECOM, Matt Letourneau who will do the presentation. After that if the committee has any questions regarding what ITS is or how we plan to move it forward we will take those. Just as an aside, we did utilize a $240,000 Grant to fund this study from CMAP. The total project was $305,000; we were able to capture some grant dollars to make this happen. With that if Mr. Letourneau could start his presentation.
Mr. Letourneau stated I am pleased to present this project to the committee today. This project as Mr. Ronaldson mentioned was driven by extensive stakeholder outreach; the purpose of the project is to create a path or identify the use of intelligent transportation systems across Will County and well into the future. This project builds on the Will Connects 2040 long range transportation plan. This continues the theme of prong activity both within the County and with external partners around the County. The timing of this project is very good in that both technologies within the industry as well as a movement across the region to create that greater connectivity between agencies is really accelerating. As Mr. Ronaldson mentioned my name is Matt Letourneau, I am the ITS Project Manager AECOM. We also are supported by TranSmart Technology as part of this project.
At this juncture Mr. Letourneau reviewed the attached PowerPoint presentation. A brief question and answer period was had after the presentation.
Mr. Van Duyne stated thank you Mr. Letourneau for all that information. I see no hands does any member of the community have any questions about the ITS System.
Mr. Moustis said I just wanted to comment; it seems to be a very thorough study and lays a good plan for the county. Mr. Ronaldson, I would just ask when we get started, what type of budget implications are there to start moving the plan forward. I would like to start implementing it immediately; only because the longer we wait the more apt it is to sit on a shelf. Maybe you have already started it; maybe you can make some additional comments on implementation; and perhaps what resources you need to start. I believe you have started some of these initiatives already; maybe you can comment on implementation Mr. Ronaldson.
Mr. Ronaldson replied as this program has a lot of components; so, it is rather daunting if you look at all the components. The plan is laid out well. As far as some foundational aspects that we must do and then build upon that; there is an estimated schedule and estimated costs in the plan as well so we can see as the components come online how much dollars that we are talking about. Some general years as to how they might come into play. That’s in the plan as well that we will utilize in moving it forward. We do in our Transportation Improvement Program allocate dollars for ITS on the order of several million dollars. It is included in the funding so, we have that. An initial component which has been in the budget last year and this year is a Traffic Engineer that will help on our side in our office and lead this and move it forward. We could advertise that; we don’t have everyone hired at this point, but it is in the budget so a least we have that going for us. We already have some of the components you are familiar with; like interconnected signals; that is already in there and we have some work coming online. As this plan gets approved as each project comes forward, we will use that plan to see what we can incorporate in the projects. Then as far as staffing, once we get the Traffic Engineer online and start moving some of these components over, we can see how we fill out the other staffing as we need. There is some shared staffing, we wouldn’t all be in this office there is some space in 911 that we will probably ultimately use; we have had those conversations. There has been some groundwork done but there is plenty to do in the years to come; and that has been laid out in the plan here in how we are going to tackle it.
Mr. Moustis asked are you going to start looking for your Traffic Engineer.
Mr. Ronaldson stated the position is posted; I will say that a Traffic Engineer is hard to find.
Mr. Weigel said the question that I had was the traffic corridors; have you identified where those are? Maybe Weber Rd. is one; what other ones might be useful on this system.
Mr. Letourneau said in the implementation plan we prioritize the interconnected traffic signal projects to focus in on those corridors with the highest levels of congestion, Weber Rd. is certainly on the list. We have also looked at Laraway Rd. and several other routes. So that we have a sequence of deployment of connecting the traffic signals combining that with the traffic management software that would allow the Traffic Engineer and the DOT. The implement timings having a greater understanding of what is going on in those key corridors. Yes, we have identified sort of a sequence of deployment; they are essentially two overarching phases of high priority corridors; and secondary corridors for deployment of these technologies. Then we break those out by year as Mr. Ronaldson mentioned over the course of a sequence of deployments.
Mr. Weigel said thank you.
Ms. Berkowicz stated Mr. Letourneau you mentioned a Community Alert System; could we learn a little bit more about that; is that under 911 area and is this going to be part of the traffic management system; what’s the relationship there? I was also wondering will this allow us to communicate with neighboring counties and in what capacity would we be doing that? If there was an accident or something catastrophic; what would this enable us to do what we are not able to do now?
Mr. Letourneau stated I will go in reverse to make sure I answer all your questions. There was involvement by other regional agencies throughout this project; IDOT, the Illinois Tollway, CMAP were each involved; as well as municipalities that overlap between different counties. That was so we could focus on those sorts of inter jurisdictional points where traffic management might currently end at a border. This would help to promote the coordination to address any incidents that might spill over from one jurisdiction to another. There is also a regional study going on right now that I am involved in that is looking to help coordinate traffic management across jurisdictional boundaries. This study helps to put the county in good position to be a part of that regional study having these technologies and these capabilities more in place. The other question of the community alert system; yes, there is a system in place now that is used by many local agencies to relay driver information and general condition information to the public. The project that we are recommending is one with the rural applications project is to expand that. The DOT right now and the county does not participate or is not providing information as part of alert system. So, the project that we are recommending would incorporate the county and the wealth of data that the county has; and that the county would then obtain through all these other projects, and the deployment of these other systems.
Ms. Berkowicz stated I have one other question. Will this allow us to take some of these major projects for example Weber Rd. and get them completed quicker? I am not sure how long the Weber Rd. project has been under construction, but it seems like it has been a decade. What can we expect?
Mr. Letourneau said it is hard to say of the scheduling of projects from other agencies outside of the county and how long, and to what extent the impacts of those projects will be. The systems that we proposed as part of this project will provide greater awareness for the DOT to understand when ques are occurring and will provide greater control of traffic signals within the county system. Potentially better coordinating with signals outside of the county system when issues like that arise; and then can make changes to signal timing for example to sort of flush out a ramp that might be backing up. When the traffic signal is timed for a certain condition and the construction is creating queuing the changes of that condition; the recommendations that we’ve included in the study would allow that traffic engineer to see congestion building and take steps to address it.
Mrs. Ogalla said at times we would have an accident on Rt. 1 out in Beecher; it is just two lanes and can really block up traffic. Will there be the ability with this system that the local Highway Commissioner, the Sheriff’s Deputies, or the Village of Beecher’s Police Department that would inform of the accident and then kick in as to which route people should go that would be the most efficient and safest route for semis to take. Would this system do that?
Mr. Letourneau stated yes, the different projects that we identified would address that scenario in a few different ways. This is something that came up in our workshops and committee meetings, this very scenario. From the Traffic and Transportation agencies standpoint, the projects that we have recommended would first allow agencies to become aware of this issue sooner, through the establishment of a centralized management center. They can then coordinate with law enforcement and local agencies. Then once the incident is first identified then steps can be taken to address it. That gets into again having greater control over traffic signals and being able to modify timings if congestion is occurring. In complementing what law enforcement might already be doing on site. On the other side of things, we have the trucking industry and the freight projects that we recommended. A couple of those projects relate to better sharing of information with truck drivers directly as well as with the Intermodal Facilities. We sort of have a dual issue there; vehicles getting off the highway and heading toward intermodal facilities. One other project we recommended provide more geographically focused information to truck drivers on the devices they have in their vehicles; helping them to understand which route to take before they get into the incident condition. Then conversely as vehicles are leaving intermodal facilities through greater coordination with the traffic management entities that those intermodal facilities; we want to establish better sharing of data so that trucks know when they are leaving the intermodal facilities not to drive into these incident conditions and further complicate the situation. We tried to attack that scenario you mentioned in a few different ways with the projects we recommended.
Mr. Van Duyne said it looks like we have a lot of information that was presented this morning; thank you both. It sounds like Mr. Ronaldson is going to be moving swiftly on this. I would like to move onto new business at this point.
| RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS] Next: 2/17/2022 9:30 AM
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Sherry Newquist, Vice Chair SECONDER: Tom Weigel, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
(PowerPoint Presentatin)
VI. OTHER OLD BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
1. Confirming Award of Contract to Preform Traffic Control Systems, Ltd. ($1,418,522.30) Let on January 19, 2022 for Countywide Striping, All County Board Districts
(Jeff Ronaldson)
| RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS] Next: 2/17/2022 9:30 AM
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member SECONDER: Jim Moustis, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
(Jeff Ronaldson)
| RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS] Next: 2/17/2022 9:30 AM
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Tom Weigel, Member SECONDER: Mica Freeman, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
(Jeff Ronaldson)
| RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS] Next: 2/17/2022 9:30 AM
TO: Will County Board MOVER: Tom Weigel, Member SECONDER: Mica Freeman, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
IX. DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION DISCUSSION
X. STATE'S ATTORNEY DISCUSSION
XI. MONTHLY WORK REPORTS
1. Construction Status Report
(Jeff Ronaldson)
2. Maintenance Status Report
(Jeff Ronaldson)
3. Phase II Summary Report
(Jeff Ronaldson)
XII. REPORTS BY COMMITTEE MEMBERS
XIII. PUBLIC COMMENT
XIV. ANNOUNCEMENTS/REPORTS BY CHAIR
Mr. Van Duyne stated I would just like to mention; these meetings are spearheaded by our County Executive, and she wanted to meet with all the municipalities throughout our county and nearby to review any concerns that they may have on the County Highway system. I had the opportunity to join the Mayor of Diamond Illinois, Coal City Representative, Braidwood, and the County Executive’s Deputy Chief of Staff Elaine Bottomely was leading the meeting along with Mr. Palmer and Mr. Ronaldson had joined. It was a nice opportunity to listen from the municipalities themselves to see any concerns that they had. I guess fortunately for us none of the concerns were any of the County Highway systems; they were extremely happy with Mr. Ronaldson and his staff and how we maintain our system. I unfortunately guess a lot of the discussion was push back to IDOT. We all know the issues there. Congratulations to Mr. Ronaldson and there will be some meetings planned for the next few months on every section of the County. I encourage our County Board Members to try to get some of that information in what comes out of these meetings and maybe we can address some of our issues. The second thing I should add is we’ve had some weather issues like we have every winter and once again our Will County DOT does a phenomenal job; a lot of the time they are in and out in 3 to 4 hours. They do a super job clearing our roads. I want to thank them for that. Hopefully they are getting a lot of rest this afternoon. They may be up for quite a while over the next few days. At least keep those folks in our prayers and thank them for the wonderful job that they are about to do.
XV. EXECUTIVE SESSION
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
1. Motion to Adjourn @ 10:01 AM
| RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Tom Weigel, Member SECONDER: Mica Freeman, Member AYES: VanDuyne, Newquist, Brooks Jr., Freeman, Gould, Moustis, Pretzel, Weigel, Winfrey |
https://willcountyil.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=12&ID=4244&Inline=True
Alerts Sign-up