Illinois school districts are now deciding whether or not to opt out of the state's new sex education policy for young children. | Pexels.com / Cottonbro
Illinois school districts are now deciding whether or not to opt out of the state's new sex education policy for young children. | Pexels.com / Cottonbro
Twenty-nine school districts in Will County are divided on conforming to Illinois’ new law that aligns sex education policies for grades K-12 with national standards.
In Will County as of June 18, 17 of its school districts said they would opt out of the provisions for younger children, while one is adopting the new sex-ed policy and 11 have yet to report a decision. The new law, which the state Legislature passed in the form of Senate Bill 818, allows districts to either opt out or adopt the sex education policies for younger children contained in the new law.
During discussions about the new policy in the Legislature, Republicans criticized the plan as being too explicit for young children. Among other provisions, sixth-graders would be expected to define phrases such as oral sex and anal sex, while third-graders would be taught to understand the act of masturbation.
Sex education advocates, however, say the new law won’t result in drastic changes for school districts since it backs up what many schools are already doing in the area of sex education.
The Catholic Conference of Illinois opposed SB 818 when it was being considered by the Legislature, arguing that although the plan offers parents an opt-out provision, many parents won’t be aware of their options. The provisions inappropriately call on fifth-graders to understand sexual orientation issues and for eighth-graders to describe how to put on a condom correctly, according to the Catholic Conference.
GOP gubernatorial frontrunner Darren Bailey, a state senator, has also come out strongly against the sex-education revisions.
“Students in the second grade may soon be required to identify consent, gender identity and reproduction, while fourth- and fifth-graders would have to define different types of sex,” Bailey said in a prepared statement. “The bill is obscene and fails to align with community standards.”
---
Local School District Decisions on New Sex-ed Policy
School District | Positions on Sex-ed Standards |
Beecher Community Unit School District 200U | Waiting or no response |
Chaney-Monge School District 88 | Waiting or no response |
Channahon School District 17 | Opting out |
Crete Monee Community Unit School District 201U | Adopting |
Elwood Community Consolidated School
District 203 | Opting out |
Fairmont School District 89 | Waiting or no response |
Frankfort Community Consolidated School
District 157C | Opting out |
Homer Community Consolidated School District 33C | Opting out |
Joliet School District 86 | Waiting or no response |
Joliet Township High School District 204 | Opting out |
Laraway Community Consolidated School
District 70C | Opting out |
Lincoln Way Consolidated High School District 210 | Opting out |
Lockport School District 91 | Waiting or no response |
Lockport Township High School District 205 | Waiting or no response |
Manhattan School District 114 | Opting out |
Mokena School District 159 | Opting out |
New Lenox School District 122 | Opting out |
Peotone Community Unit School District 207U | Opting out |
Plainfield School District 202 | Opting out |
Reed Custer Community Unit School District 255U | Opting out |
Richland School District 88A | Opting out |
Rockdale School District 84 | Opting out |
Summit Hill School District 161 | Waiting or no response |
Taft School District 90 | Waiting or no response |
Troy Community Consolidated School
District 30C | Opting out |
Union School District 81 | Waiting or no response |
Valley View Community Unit School
District 365U | Waiting or no response |
Will County School District 92 | Waiting or no response |
Wilmington Community Unit School
District 209U | Opting out |