Will County Capital Improvements Committee met Sept. 4.
Here is the minutes provided by the Committee:
I. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Chair Ray Tuminello called the meeting to order at 11:15 AM
| Attendee Name | Title | Status |
| Ray Tuminello | Chair | Present |
| Mike Fricilone | Vice Chair | Present |
| Gloria Dollinger | Member | Present |
| Gretchen Fritz | Member | Present |
| Charles E. Maher | Member | Present |
| Donald A. Moran | Member | Present |
| Annette Parker | Member | Present |
| Beth Rice | Member | Present |
| Denise E. Winfrey | Member | Present |
Present from State's Attorney's Office: M. Tatroe.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
Mr. Maher led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. WC Capital Improvements Committee - Regular Meeting - Aug 7, 2018 11:00 AM
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Mike Fricilone, Vice Chair
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
IV. OLD BUSINESS
1. City of Joliet Presentation Update on the Downtown Sanitary and Storm Sewer Project (Allison Swisher)
This item was moved to the beginning of the meeting.
Ms. Allison Swisher gave an update on the downtown sanitary and storm sewer project. We have been contained south of Washington on DesPlaines and Lafayette Street. We are having a lot of issues with the amount of rock in the area.
We are breaking 15 feet of bedrock and most days they get in only 8 feet. There have been some schedule concerns; we need to get further ahead to make sure our pipe is installed in time for you to have the gas and electric service installed for the courthouse. We talked to the contractor and they proposed working 24/7 and they will jump ahead to the intersection of Joliet and Washington and move east. That will allow us to get the pipe in the ground so Nicor and ComEd can come in and do their work. The implication is we will have to close Washington Street between Ottawa and Joliet. We are working on getting a detour plan prepared and approved. We hope to begin September 10.
Mr. Tuminello stated a concern of this Committee was being in the same area so we could tie in do the work collectively. They are going to skip over and start in a new location then go back to finish when our lines are laid with the City’s. That will keep the courthouse project on schedule with no delays.
Ms. Swisher stated we will not repave the road twice, the work will happen in conjunction with projects and the road will be repaved at the end. We cannot work in the IDOT ROW during winter time. Over the winter we will be working on Washington south of the existing courthouse and cutting through the courthouse parking lot. By next spring we will be back out on Jefferson Street.
Mr. Tuminello asked how long do you expect the detour to be in place?
Ms. Swisher answered between 45 and 60 days. We knew there would be rock, but we did not know the strength. We will be issuing press releases when the detour is approved with our Public Works Department. We have been working with Mr. Tkac and Gilbane to make sure we are accommodating all the schedules.
2. Update from Courthouse Delivery Teams (Wight, Gilbane & Farnsworth) (Discussion)
Mr. Tom Leonard reviewed the attached Project Status Report dated September 4, 2018.
Mr. Tuminello announced the topping out ceremony will be Friday, October 19th, when the final beam is put up and everyone will sign it.
Mr. Fricilone asked when is the escalator being put in?
Mr. Tkac stated the escalator from the second floor to the third is in; otherwise logistically we could not get it put in. The steel is in for the other.
Mr. Fricilone asked have the details been worked out for screws for the mockup?
Mr. Dwyer replied we have not finalized that yet and we are still looking at it. We are doing the mockup to look at everything. The workmanship on the vertical fins was not great and we are looking at another option of doing pop rivets instead of a screw fastener. No decision yet, but we continue to look at this. This is the reason we do the mockup to double check everything and make sure that we are getting everything the way we want it.
Mr. Fricilone asked when will installation begin?
Mr. Dwyer stated it will be awhile because it is the excursion of the face of the curtain wall.
Mr. Mike Wolf stated we are working with Gilbane and Wight to finalize the envelop onsite mockup testing. This is different than the aesthetics one; it is the one we are testing for performance. We are retesting a few areas where there were failures, in August. We are also performing site inspections and observations of the vapor barriers and radiant piping; this is done before the slab is poured. We want to observe that, because once the slab is poured you cannot see it. We are attending the trade contractor coordination meetings; working with Gilbane to discuss quality control, quality assurance activities and making sure they are coordinated; it is coordinating an overall quality plan and keeping it in front of people. In September we will be planning a formal commissioning kickoff meeting with all the trade contractors to make sure early in the process everyone sees the commissioning process, gets introduced to it and we get ownership from all the trades and subs.
Mr. Moustis stated you mentioned you are retesting areas that failed. What areas failed?
Mr. Wolf replied we had issues with the vapor barrier. A different product was put on and retested on August 14th; there was still one or two areas that were not compliant and pulled lose. The testing is a pull test to make sure the vapor barrier adheres.
Mr. Moustis stated this is one thing that is extremely important because once it is up it is up.
Mr. Leonard stated they are looking at the exterior sheathing material. They have gone back to the manufacturer and looking at the next step up on that material to see if it will provide what we need.
Mr. Moustis asked at what point are you satisfied? I want to make 100% sure whatever goes up will not fail, even 10 or 15 years down the road. It is supposed to be a lifetime application and it should not fail for the life of the building. What makes you feel comfortable? How do you decide this will work and to the best of our ability we are confident it should work?
Mr. Dwyer replied we do all of this testing to make sure we test the products and make sure they will perform as we expect before they are installed on the building. As part of the design process, Farnsworth put together a rigorous testing program for all aspects of the building. This is just a normal course of doing our work to make sure the components and products are working. We know the products have passed the tests effectively is when we have the confidence they will work for the duration of the building. We have not yet determined the ultimate cause of failure on this; I have not heard the results of Friday’s test. That is why we are testing before it is installed to make sure we don’t have those concerns once it is installed.
Mr. Moustis stated if there is a problem with manufacturing, do we continue to test as we go along? How do we know from the manufacturer, the integrity of the product is always the same? You can test and say this works, but how do you assure that is the case throughout the building, especially as it is manufactured in different runs. Do you test along the way?
Mr. Wolf replied this is an industry standard ASTM test on the mockup. These tests follow the industry best practices standards. We are also following best practice sampling rates. If we see the test fail, we look at the root cause of the failure. What we are looking for to move on with this product is to see an acceptable amount of samples passing.
Mr. Moustis clarified you will be sampling all the way.
Mr. Wolf continued yes, we want to understand the root cause of the failure and see the failure resolved in a retest. We don’t want to assume it is an adhesive and try a different adhesive. We want to apply the new adhesive and retest so we see another sample that passes. That is the first part of the mockup. The mockup ensures everything is working exactly like we want it to. We identify things early and not when it is on the building. We make sure this is integrated into the quality control plan. If there is a special material or things we found in terms of the installation contributing to the noncompliance, then we would incorporate that into the quality control plan. That is us working with Gilbane and Wight as a coordinated team to make sure everyone takes on the responsibility of installing those systems like on the mockup. We know the mockup passed and was acceptable.
Mr. Moustis asked how do you make sure it is being applied properly? Is that your oversight to make sure the contractor is installing it property?
Mr. Leonard responded we have looked at all the different components of the mockup as we have gone through the test; the adhesive, the air vapor barrier and sheathing, we have looked at all the components. The manufacturers have been out and we are still reviewing details with them. Once we get this set and arrive at a course of action that is going to pass the test on the mockup; in construction, there are periodic tests during the actual installation of the product. Any changes or adjustments made to the mockup will be incorporated by us, since that is our responsibility in construction and oversee that so the construction proceeds along those lines.
Mr. Tuminello stated this is typical, this is a very standard procedure. Every job site with a building of this magnitude has mockups and goes through the same testing, because a product officially given an ASTM standard it is done in a laboratory setting that does not always apply to every job site and condition. That is why we do the mockup, it is a very common practice. I don’t want anyone to be alarmed.
Mr. Tkac stated we are talking about one sample failure out of multiple samples from the mockup. This is an adhesion of a very thin air and vapor barrier to the sub-straight. We have to get it right and we will.
Mr. Dwyer stated the whole team is focused on these kind of things with great diligence. We have talked about, if some reason we think there is a worry or it is not getting right, there are other options and materials. As a team we are committed to making sure we have the right materials. If the one product we are testing now has concerns, there are options and no one is afraid to do that if that is what is necessary.
Gilbane Project Status September 4, 2018 (Handout)
3. Discussion Re: Solar Panels on Will County Courthouse (Tom Leonard, Gilbane)
Ms. Bluemer reviewed the attached updated figures for Solar PV at County owned sites.
Mr. Fricilone asked what do you expect the life to be?
Ms. Bluemer replied they will produce for 40+ years. The efficiency of the system, how much output they provide will go down incrementally; usually you see the derogation rate after 25 years. They are usually warrantied to 25 year point to at least put out 180%.
Mr. Fricilone asked are you still projecting 7% of the buildings electrical use?
Ms. Bluemer responded it is a little more because the system is slightly larger; but I used a 7% to 8% number based on the Wight modeling.
Mr. Fricilone asked did the modeling consider inflation in the rates?
Ms. Bluemer stated I used the numbers we procured electric at earlier this year. It is very low, but we are looking to see if we can save even more money on the capacity end of the bills. I can factor in a slight escalation, but the market is so volatile it is very hard to hedge what we think will happen in 20 years. We have to assume it will go up. I included the total breakdown of fees, taxes and transmission to give you a true return.
Mr. Fricilone asked do these numbers include the roof and second floor?
Ms. Bluemer replied yes.
Mr. Tkac stated in October we will bring a change order for the electrical conduit and everything short of the array. We are holding off on procurement of the array because we might get a better deal or there could be technology advances. The conduit and everything will be in place.
Ms. Bluemer stated the tariffs will decrease incrementally as time goes on.
Mr. Moustis stated we left solar as an option, because we wanted to see how the job was going. It seems budget wise it is coming along. For the solar, there is a return, but it also makes a statement to future investment in Will County that we are progressive and look at these things. It is not just about the ROI, part of the ROI is the statement it makes. How quickly do you need us to tell you we are going forward?
Mr. Moran asked is there equipment screening on the roof and if so, is any of that unnecessary should we go with the solar panels?
Mr. Dwyer stated most of the equipment is inside the penthouse so I don’t think this will have an impact.
Mr. Tkac stated a concern we have is the window washing operation and its impact on the solar arrays; either the sallyport on the south elevation or the main roof. We have been looking into that closely and working through those details. We are pretty close to having those worked out. When we talked about the costs associated with the solar array, we talked about this from a conception standpoint compared to where we are now. We said $250,000 total. With the cost of the structural steel and the electrical work necessary to prepare for the panel installations, we are around $160,000; leaving us $90,000 in the budget to purchase the actual arrays.
Mr. Fricilone asked how long can we wait to buy?
Mr. Leonard replied we would want to place our order by the end of this year.
Ms. Bluemer stated each year the tariffs on solar go down. I don’t know if it will cost more to purchase later.
Mr. Maher asked what would happen if we waited 10 years? If our payback is between 8 and 25 years, technology will evolve, batteries will get better. Where are we on the structure of this?
Mr. Tkac replied we spent approximately $40,000 on the structural steel modifications for the extra weight. We are going to present a change order for the electrical conduit and wiring and everything to equip the solar array, once the panels are installed. Everything, short of the panels and mounting frames that go on the roof is already in the budget.
Mr. Tuminello stated we felt it would cost up to $250,000 to get the building solar ready. Once we approve the final change order for the electrical; we will have only used $160,000 of that amount. We will use the $90,000 for the solar.
Mr. Maher asked what will it cost to connect everything?
Ms. Bluemer answered my numbers came from estimations provided by Gilbane. If anything has changed we can address that. It will not be more financially fruitful to install later, because the Illinois incentives are concentrated over the next three years and decline as time goes on. They are a huge piece of what makes this happen. Solar panels are always getting more efficient and the inverters are getting smarter, but I don’t think anything will happen in this timeframe to make it dramatically more economically effective to hold off to install. I believe the sooner the better to install.
Mr. Dwyer stated it is tougher to come back and install after the construction is done. It is beneficial to get it done with the rest of construction. The price of solar panels has been fluctuating, but it will not make an impact if you wait, especially if you lose incentive dollars by waiting. It is probably better to do it now.
Mr. Tuminello asked if you took all the incentives out, what would the payback be?
Ms. Bluemer stated it would probably be double plus. We can look into battery storage later. The price of batteries is something that waiting a few years will have an economic impact. They are getting smaller and more cost efficient. We are keeping that as an option.
Mr. Fricilone stated if we are only using 7% for the building, we will use everything those panels generate. Do we need batteries?
Ms. Bluemer answered there are other things you can do with batteries and you can take the energy and store it on the grid.
Mr. Dwyer stated at the last meeting there was a question about whether there would be an issue with the solar panels on the sallyport if a building was built to the south. We did an analysis and you would have a building over 60 feet tall before it would have an impact. That would impact the first run of panels on the far south end of the sallyport in November through January.
Estimate for Solar PV at Courthouse 04sept18 (Handout)
4. Discussion Re: Animal Control Facility and EMA Building (Discussion)
Mr. Van Essen gave an overview of the project schedule. Animal Control design has been completed. EMA is expected to be finished Friday. The design will be wrapping up and going over to Harbour. We are sending it out for bid on September 12th. They have already looked at the various scopes. We will do a combo outreach on September 18th, Animal Control, EMA and Health Department. The outreach meetings will be in the Board Room at 3:30 p.m. The bids will be due on October 11th at 1:00 p.m. We will do a special Capital Committee on October 30th to approve the bids for Animal Control, EMA and Health Department.
Mr. Tuminello stated when we went to one meeting per month, we did say by the end of the year we would need a few special meetings to go through the bid packages and then go back to one meeting per month. We will not be meeting on November 6th it will be on November 13th instead.
Mr. Van Essen stated for the Health Department we will have other dates for November, December and January for bid openings.
Mr. Moustis stated the bid packages for the Health Department will be in October.
Mr. Van Essen clarified we are doing the outreach on September 18th for all buildings. We will send out the design on the 24th and the opening will be on October 16th.
Mr. Moustis stated then Leopardo will put the bid packages together. When will the bid packages be ready for the street?
Mr. Van Essen replied September 12th. In October our key dates are the 11th and 16th; they are both coming to the Committee on the 30th for approval.
Mr. Tuminello stated we wanted to get these on the street by the end of the year to get a favorable response.
Mr. Van Essen stated that is our biggest push. We are wrapping up the final tweaks for the final designs by Friday.
Mr. Dwyer stated we submitted both Animal Control and EMA for permits
previously. We are now tying up loose end to make sure it is bid ready. We have received a few permit review comments back on Animal Control, minor items. EMA has only been in for about one week. We expect to receive comments on that shortly.
5. Update from Health Department Team (Kluber) (Discussion)
Mr. Elliott reviewed the attached handout Monthly Report - September 4, 2018. We have completed all our internal meetings with Health Department users. Those meetings included identifying and laying out locations for casework equipment and furniture for the project. On September 11th at 10:00 a.m. we have a tentative meeting with the City of Joliet; this will consist of primarily site building and utility conversations with HR Green, Leopardo and County staff. The purpose of the meeting is to bring them up to speed. They have seen the previous schematic design package. We will give them an update on the schedule and let them know our expectations of them and review the final connectivity of the utility systems, part of bid package #1. The City of Joliet has adopted a new building code that will be in effect as of September 8th. All projects being done in the City will be under the 2015 IBC Code. We found out early enough to make a few minor modifications to the drawings, so the drawings will be going out under that new code. These are the deliverable dates by which Kluber must get the information to Leopardo. We are on track for September 24th to turn over bid package #1 drawings. Bid package #1 is site development, building pad, site utilities and a small demolition. On October 22nd we deliver bid package #2, which is the core and shell, exterior envelop and roofing and elevator. On November 19th we will deliver bid package #3, which is the finish out of the space, mechanical, electrical, walls, doors etc. everything on the inside will be delivered to Leopardo. We had a successful preliminary meeting with ComEd on grant opportunities on August 9th. We have identified a number of items in the building that will quality for grant money. We will be turning over our design development drawings to them for their review on September 17th after they are given to Leopardo. They will review to make sure what we are specifying will meet their requirements for the grants. On August 6th we had a kickoff meeting with IT as it relates to the County’s IT contractor, Meade Electric to coordinate the site IT requirements for the first bid package. That has been completed; they are in the process of completing those drawings and will be included as part of our bid package. Moving forward we will continue to focus on the completion of the design development package as well as the specs and plans for bid package #1. There is a neighborhood meet and greet scheduled for the 27th from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. to let the neighbors know about the project, the scheduling and phasing. All parties will be participating in that meeting. We are looking forward to working with Farnsworth Group on this project. We have pre-drafted some of the commissioning requests that correlate with our specs and my intention is to deliver that today for their review.
Ms. Nicole McElroy stated we will be having a bid package #1 public outreach pre-bid meeting before the documents are released on the street, on September 18th at 3:30. We have been working with Mr. Van Essen and Ms. Weiss. We will finalize what we perceive to be our bidders’ list and send it to the County. If anyone wants to be added they will be added at that time. If they see it when it goes on the street they can be added as well. That is how we have done this in the past and it worked. That is the first public outreach milestone. The documents will be issued from Kluber on September 24th and Leopardo will release them on the street on September 25th. A few days later will be the neighborhood outreach. That will be the second outreach meeting. Kluber will present where we are to date from a floor plan standpoint and what to expect. Leopardo will answer questions on how this will affect them during the construction phase. We have been working with the Health Department, the County and Kluber on logistics, because it will be a big feat, and we are very much prepared for. We will give a very detailed logistics plan on phasing, dates, what will be going on, signage, everything to give them more comfort on the few years it will affect them, but it will be exciting in the long run. From there we will open it up to Q&A. We are still on track for our construction start date of November 26, 2018. We are looking at substantial completion on November 25, 2020. Tentatively, the building is set for completion June 10, 2020. It will be complete before the entire complex, very similar to the Public Safety Complex. There are four phases to this to slowly phase everyone in and Leopardo to complete their work.
Ms. Olenek presented a sample of the door hangers for the neighborhood adjacent to the facility.
Mr. Tuminello asked will the changes to the City of Joliet codes affect the sewer line going down Route 53?
Mr. Tkac replied no, nor will it impact the courthouse, because the permit was issued prior to the adopting of the new code.
Ms. McElroy stated last week we discussion temp parking for the Health Department and Sunny Hill. There needs to be a minimum 400 temporary spots during construction. If you look at the site, there are not 400 spots during construction. Where the main building is now is where the main parking will be going at the end. Not good from a temporary standpoint. At the original interview it was mentioned you might need 250 for the Health Department. Sunny Hill backs up to the Health Department and needs their spaces. We determined we could get onsite at a minimum in the shorter phase 175; the maximum would be 300. Mr. Van Essen and Mr. Tkac did an analysis to look at areas where there could be a shuttle, which seemed to be the most cost effective route. We did look at adding temp parking, but there is not a lot of space. In the space you could add parking, the soil is not good. It would not just be putting down stone, it would include stabilizing it and that would be a waste of funds. We have been working with the Health Department, Mr. Van Essen and Mr. Tkac on shuttling people in. You cannot just do this from 9:00 to 5:00 there are different shifts and it is part of the logistics to make sure the neighborhood, employees and workers understand and make sure we are on the same page. We have not finalized anything, but we brought all parties together and had a very good discussion.
Kluber Monthly Report September 4, 2018 (Handout)
Health Department Door Hanger (handout)
V. OTHER OLD BUSINESS
VI. NEW BUSINESS
1. City of Joliet Presentation Update on the Downtown Sanitary and Storm Sewer Project
This item was discussed at the beginning of the meeting.
2. Update on Hippo Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) (Joel Van Essen)
Mr. Van Essen gave a brief review of the HIPPO system; how work orders are entered and processed and how preventive maintenance is entered, process and completed. The system also tracks hours to complete the project. There is a communication tool to let the person requesting maintenance know it has been completed.
Mr. Maher asked who sets the priorities?
Mr. Van Essen replied the Facilities Manager. With very hot or critical items most likely someone has called.
Mrs. Dollinger asked is travel time included in the tracking of hours to complete a project?
Mr. Van Essen answered most of the time they are in the building. Otherwise, it is a short time to the ADF or Public Safety Complex when they drive.
Mr. Van Essen gave details of how the program will track and report the preventative maintenance items for the buildings.
Mr. Fricilone asked who set that up initially?
Mr. Van Essen replied we did. The items were entered with how often preventative maintenance is needed, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually based on the system requirements.
Mr. Fricilone asked when a new piece of equipment is added are you looking at the warranties and talking with Farnsworth about how often equipment should be looked at?
Mr. Van Essen answered Farnsworth was involved as we set up the Public Safety Complex and they looked at what we sent into the HIPPO organization.
Mr. Fricilone asked how do you manage preventative maintenance, since it came be done during slow time?
Mr. Van Essen examples of how items populated on the first of the month can be placed in specific dates of the month. Preventative maintenance takes place during a time frame and not necessarily on that particular day.
Mr. Moran asked is it smart? If an item needs to be replaced more often than originally in the manufacturer’s suggested timeframe, does the system learn to change belts every three or six months versus annually?
Mr. Van Essen replied it is not that intelligent. The system allows us to change from quarterly to monthly. It is more of our workforce informing the Facility Manager of a status. The system generates monthly reports for all the equipment and shows what has been done. This will also be used as a check for accreditations necessary for Sunny Hill, ADF and RVJC. If you need validation you did it, a report can be printed. If the state comes in to inspect something you can now print out the report to show the maintenance has been done. It is a historical data file.
Mrs. Johannsen asked do all the department know how to access this? Do they know how to use the system and not call?
Mr. Van Essen answered we did a staggered rollout for managers and supervisors. They were to appoint someone within their office to make requests and it is easy to add someone.
3. Authorizing the Will County Executive to Amend Contract with Kluber Architects & Engineers to Include Services for Specialty Sub-Consultants and Additional Services by Kluber During Construction and Post-Construction Phases for the New Will County Health Department Facility
(Dave Tkac)
Mrs. Rice asked how do these extra costs come into play now as opposed to earlier in the process.
Mr. Tkac replied when Kluber finished the programming, we had not engaged them for services needed to design the building. All we had was a program compiled by Kluber in conjunction with the end user. In order to keep the project moving forward and keeping the design development on track, we had to move forward with the value of a project that while we had an idea where the costs were going to be and we picked a number of $20 million total construction cost and used that as a basis for engaging the services of the design firm, Kluber. We based on initial negotiations on that to move forward with design development. As the DD progressed and as we reached the 100% milestone with DD we had our CM on board and they did an estimate for us. We fine-tuned the construction costs and that increased from the benchmark of $20 million to $25 million figure. The negotiated amount for basic services, if you apply the percentage factor of 6.75 to that, the fee increased based on the knowledge and estimated costs of the project as opposed to when we began the negotiations. We did not have anything other than an estimated, conceptional budget figure. We only included services to deliver documents for bid. We did not include any services from the architect beyond bid documents; this takes care of their involvement during the construction phase and post construction phase.
RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS]
TO: Will County Board
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
4. Authorizing the Will County Executive to Amend Contract with Farnsworth Group to Include Building Commissioning Services for the New Will County Health Department Facility (Dave Tkac)
RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS]
TO: Will County Board
MOVER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
SECONDER: Donald A. Moran, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
5. Authorizing the Will County Executive to Amend Contract with Farnsworth Group to Include Building Commissioning Services for the New Will County Animal Control Facility and EMA Storage Building Project (Dave Tkac)
RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS]
TO: Will County Board
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gretchen Fritz, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
6. Authorizing the County Executive to Execute a Professional Services Agreement with Harbour Contractors Inc. for Construction Management Services Required for the New Will County Animal Control Facility and Emergency Management Equipment Storage Building Project (Dave Tkac)
RESULT: MOVED FORWARD [UNANIMOUS]
TO: Will County Board
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gretchen Fritz, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
7. Authorizing Payment to Leopardo Companies Inc., for the Will County Public Safety Complex
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
SECONDER: Mike Fricilone, Vice Chair
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
8. Authorizing Payment to HR Green for the Will County Public Safety Complex
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Annette Parker, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
9. Authorizing Payment to Farnsworth Group for the Will County Public Safety Complex
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
10. Authorizing Payment to CES for the Will County Public Safety Complex
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gretchen Fritz, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
11. Authorizing Payment to Gilbane Building Company for the Will County Courthouse
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gretchen Fritz, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
12. Authorizing Payment to Wight & Company for the Will County Courthouse
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
13. Authorizing Payment to ComEd for the Will County Courthouse
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gloria Dollinger, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
14. Authorizing Payment to Farnsworth Group for the Will County Courthouse
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Annette Parker, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
15. Authorizing Payment to Seeco Environmental Services Inc., for the Will County Courthouse
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
16. Authorizing Payment to Meade Industries Inc., for Will County Health Department
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
17. Authorizing Payment to Wight & Company for the Will County Animal Control Facility
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Gloria Dollinger, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
18. Authorizing Payment to B&F Construction Code Services Inc., for the Will County Animal Control Facility
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
19. Authorizing Payment to Wight & Company for the Will County EMA Facility
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Donald A. Moran, Member
SECONDER: Denise E. Winfrey, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
VII. OTHER NEW BUSINESS
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT
IX. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT / ANNOUNCEMENTS
X. EXECUTIVE SESSION
XI. ADJOURNMENT
1. Motion to Adjourn at 12:32 PM
RESULT: APPROVED [UNANIMOUS]
MOVER: Gloria Dollinger, Member
SECONDER: Beth Rice, Member
AYES: Tuminello, Fricilone, Dollinger, Fritz, Maher, Moran, Parker, Rice, Winfrey
https://willcountyil.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=15&ID=3065&Inline=True
Alerts Sign-up