Quantcast

Will County Gazette

Tuesday, May 7, 2024

Will County Land Use and Development Committee met September 11.

Meeting 04

Will County Land Use and Development Committee met September 11.

Here is the minutes provided by the committee:

I. Pledge Of Allegiance

Chairman Weigel led the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

II. Call To Order And Declaration Of Quorum

Chair Tom Weigel called the meeting to order at 10:35 am

Attendee Name; Title; Status; Arrived:

Tom Weigel; Chair; Present

Judy Ogalla; Vice Chair; Present

Steve Balich; Member; Present

Mark Ferry; Member; Present

Laurie Summers; Member; Present

Denise E. Winfrey; Member; Present

Debbie Militello District 6 (R - Channahon) Present

The roll was called. A quorum was declared.

Also present were:

Land Use Department Staff

Brian Radner, Interim Director of Development Services

Colin Duesing, Planner, Administration & Planning

David Dubois, Interim Director of Administration & Planning

Janine Farrell, Planner, Development Review

Jessica Gal, Planner, Development Review

Margie Kinny, Planner, Development Review

Pat Cline, Secretary, Development Review

Samantha Bluemer, Conservation Specialist, Resource, Recovery & Energy

Rhonda Novak, Will County Assessor

Matt Guzman, Assistant State's Attorney, Will County State's Attorney's Office

III. Approval Of Minutes

1. Motion to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of the August 14, 2018 Land Use & Development Committee meeting as presented.

The motion carried unanimously 6-0.

Result: Approved [6 To 0]

Mover: Denise E. Winfrey, Member

Seconder: Steve Balich, Member

Ayes: Weigel, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

Away: Ogalla

2. Solar Farm Guide Presentation by Staff: (Samantha Bluemer)

Samantha Bluemer gave a brief presentation on what she called a working draft of the "Will County Solar Farm Guide." The draft was presented to make sure we are going in the right direction and hopefully have something County Officials, developers and members of the public can use in making decisions regarding solar energy.

The guide begins with an introduction as to what solar farms are and the technology. Why they are called solar farms. Why they are here.

In a simplified form it talks about how solar works.

Then it breaks down into the different categories of solar such as what if somebody says this is a DG Project. What is DG Project? This is a community solar project. What does that really mean? Why are we calling it community solar? What incentives are associated? Why is this such a popular category of solar?

It defines utility scale solar. It talks about the three different types of solar that is coming about because of our current State legislation.

It talks about the State incentives. It also talks about the Federal Investment Tax Credit and how that decreases over time. What impacts this has on solar in Will County.

What we are getting at here is that solar has desirable incentives and why that is the type of solar you are seeing in front of you the most.

There has been discussion about rooftop, brown field categories of incentives.

It discusses what a developer needs to apply for incentives. We have a lottery system in this State for the "Block Program." Block Program just means there are three different balls of money that will be distributed for solar specifically for this type of solar farm development that you see and what's needed.

The application pool will open on November 1, 2018. Then it will all be a lottery system. This explains why there is such an effort to acquire as much land as possible to increase the odds that a particular developer's project will get approved and help offset the expenses incurred in acquiring the land.

Samantha presented a map showing what solar farms have been approved thus far. There is a geographical presentation showing where these developments have occurred and which ones are pending. That will be a moving map so changes can be made as they occur.

Site selection as well as density will also be discussed.

Examples of states that already have this type of development in place are discussed so we can get an idea what to expect.

A vegetative guide provided by the Forest Preserve is also included that recommends what types of vegetation these folks should really be looking at. It looks to the future once the development is no longer there what types of vegetation would be best for the environment. This will aid developers in presenting a landscaping plan that will be readily acceptable to the community as well.

Janine Farrell from staff has written the entire zoning section regarding solar that will also be added to this guide.

Rhonda Novak's tax assessment portion will be added as well.

The Chairman said it sounds like a great presentation and program.

Mark Ferry said it makes it a really simple read. Good job so far.

Laurie Summers went to the Planning & Zoning Commission and saw the map showing where they are at. It's really an awesome map.

Judy Ogalla is glad to see that we're doing this. We've been talking about it for a long time. It's very important that we have something the public can see and look at the information.

Judy said she knows Kankakee has a little PDF that they've created. It might to be good to include some of that information because it shows pictures of what a solar farm would look like. Judy suggested that we might want to put something in there that talks about if you are an adjacent land owner you can expect this amount of decibels and what protections are put in place. Such things as what vegetation is put in place to address potential runoff.

Judy Ogalla suggested when Samantha gets to the point where we're ready to send this out to local townships maybe we can send them an email with the updated map on a monthly basis. Mrs. Ogalla thanked everyone in Land Use for all the hard work they put in on this.

Samantha thanked Board Member Ogalla and the other committee members for their comments. A tour of a solar farm is scheduled for October 12th. Those interested can send Samantha or Janine an email. They will also be making a video of the inverter that day.

Debbie Militello thanked staff and suggested cities and villages that it effects be included.

Board Member Ogalla asked Samantha to make sure Mark Schneidewind is included and aware of this and also to send surrounding landowners a hard copy. She suggested they might also want to look at fencing, pricing and so forth.

Samantha said they have been working with all our townships and municipalities and all our fire districts are interested in additional training so they are working with the Interstate Renewable Energy Council to set up a one day training session at one of our County facilities. It will be half a day residential and half a day solar farms.

Chairman Weigel suggested Sam might want to invite the Committee members to that, too.

IV. New Business

1.Ordinance Amending the Will County, Illinois Zoning Ordinance Adopted and Approved September 9, 1947 as Amended, for Zoning Case ZC-18-042, Beverly J. Wassman Trust Dated May 31, 2011 Owner of Record; Vincent Schrementi (25% interest), Sara Schrementi (25% interest), and Beverly J. Wassman (50% interest), Jonathan Roberts of Soltage, LLC, Agent, Bryan Keyt of Bryan Cave; Attorney, Requesting (S-18-016) Special Use Permit for a Major Public Utility, a Solar Farm, for Pin #23-15-15-400-010-0000, in Crete Township, Commonly Known as 631 S. Cottage Grove Avenue, Crete, IL

(Janine Farrell)

The Chairman announced Zoning Case ZC-18-042.

Zoning Case ZC-18-042 takes place in Crete Township. It is a request for a special use permit for a solar farm on a 33-acre parcel. The special use area is for the entire 33 acres even though the solar farm will occupy only a portion of the 33 acres.

There were no objectors at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.

No objections were received from any of the agencies notified of the request.

Staff recommended approval of the special use with ten (10) conditions.

The Planning & Zoning Commission also recommended approval of the special use permit with those ten (10) conditions.

There was a motion by Winfrey, seconded by Balich.

The Chairman said he noticed they mentioned in there that they need four poles in order to connect to ComEd. Chairman Weigel said that's not in our normal procedure. Do we have to add a condition for that?

Janine stated if the Committee so chooses. The Ordinance states the utilities have to be underground and come above ground only when necessary to connect to ComEd utilities. If the Committee would like to allow those four poles that would have to be added as a condition.

Chairman Weigel said he doesn't see where that would cause a problem. It seems like they put different equipment on different poles and maybe this facilitates their plan of action. He asked does anybody have an objection to that?

Samantha said just so the Committee is aware usually ComEd determines if those poles have to be added and actually they are the property of ComEd. Sometimes that's stipulated and going forward Samantha said she guesses we could ask developers or applicants rather to stipulate if that was provided necessary by the utility.

Chairman Weigel said maybe they could add that to the condition.

Judy Ogalla said she noticed while reading through the documentation in the staff analysis that the applicant intends to enclose the special use area with a 7 foot chain link security fence in accordance with the National Electric Code standards. The applicant did not indicate if the fence will have barbed or razor wire. Mrs. Ogalla said she thought that was something we were not going to be doing. She asked staff for a response.

Janine said typically the applicants or the developers note that it will be a chain link fence without barbed wire or razor wire. In this particular instance they did not specify if it would have barbed wire or razor wire at the top. The depiction does not show that but it was something that Janine noted that it did not specifically state that it will not.

Judy Ogalla said that is something we should really look at as a group. Do we want to give any developer the right to make that determination or is that a determination we want to make ourselves.

Janine mentioned that barbed wire and razor wire are permitted within the A-1 district. Farm fencing is usually about four feet (4') but with these at seven feet (7') you don't want a deer getting hung up on that.

Denise Winfrey pointed out that may be allowed by right in that area so although we may not like it that may already be allowed by right.

Debbie Militello said if she were a developer she might be thinking of that in terms of keeping people out and from doing damage rather than thinking about animals.

Colin Duesing said with the Zoning Ordinance the Electric Code says that it should be a minimum six foot (6') with chain link fence above it. We took that out of our Zoning Ordinance so we only allow the seven foot (7') chain link fence. Colin thinks this is where the confusion lies.

Jessica Gal read from the Zoning Ordinance that states a minimum height of seven foot (7') high fencing is required. The use of razor wire or barbed wire is prohibited unless expressly approved. This is with regard to the solar farm.

Chairman Weigel asked Samantha about adding the condition that a riser pole is permitted if ComEd requests it.

Sam said the tax assessment on these properties is based on the panel improvements so any change to the property, even if that is a ComEd pole because even ComEd pays taxes; so maybe we should get a list of all the items to be added so we have some consistency with the taxing of these properties.

Chairman Weigel asked staff if they should include the four poles?

Staff indicated it really is up to ComEd to decide how many poles and or the types of equipment is necessary to connect to their utility lines.

Jonathan Roberts introduced himself as a developer of solar energy with Soltage LLC. He has an engineering background. He has built about 51 of these projects in about 7 states. They primarily need the poles to connect with ComEd's infrastructure. As Sam mentioned it's often specified to them by ComEd how they would like them to interconnect with their system. Typically, it would involve wires going from our poles to their poles to interconnect with their distribution and transmission network.

Chairman Weigel asked Mr. Roberts why he needs four poles? Is there different equipment on different poles? Do you also have a shed on the property?

Mr. Johnson said we will not have a shed. Somebody mentioned a cabinet. They will probably have a 10 x 10 cabinet on their inverter on the transmission pad to take the AC from the inverter to the poles.

The Chairman said so the equipment doesn't replace the poles.

They do not replace them. They work together as one system.

Chairman Weigel asked Mr. Johnson you would like the four poles?

Mr. Johnson said yes and ComEd may specify additional infrastructure to connect to their grid for safety and reliability.

Rhonda asked Mr. Johnson how the 10 x 10 foot cabinet he referred to attached to the foundation?

Mr. Johnson said it would be secured and most likely be on a concrete pad. Regarding the chain link fence question they specified in their site plan a seven foot (7') fence with no barbed wire.

2. Motion to add infrastructure as required by ComEd.

Samantha suggested they might want to say infrastructure in case it's something other than a pole.

The motion carried unanimously 7-0.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Steve Balich, Member

Seconder: Judy Ogalla, Vice Chair

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

3. Motion to approve a Special Use Permit for a solar farm for Zoning Case ZC-18- 042 with eleven (11) conditions as amended.

The motion carried 7-0.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Steve Balich, Member

Seconder: Judy Ogalla, Vice Chair

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

4. Ordinance Amending the Will County, Illinois Zoning Ordinance Adopted and Approved September 9, 1947 as Amended for zoning case ZC-18-043, Caryn L. Verduin , Owner of Record, Jonathan Roberts of Soltage, LLC , Agent, Bryan Keyt of Bryan Cave, Attorney, requesting (S-18-017) special use permit for a major public utility, a solar farm, for PIN # 23-15-34-200-009-0000,in Crete Township, commonly known as vacant property on East Goodenow Road, Beecher, IL (Jessica Gal) The Chairman announced the next case is ZC-18-043.

Jessica Gal from staff opened discussion of the case.

Zoning Case ZC-18-043 concerns a 29.5-acre (vacant) parcel located north of E. Goodenow Road and east of Dutton Road. It is located just west of three previously approved solar farms. One was by Cypress Creek Renewables and the other two were by Borrego Solar Systems.

Objectors appeared at the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. Their objections included noise, drainage, proximity to residential properties, lower property values, traffic, improper lighting, detrimental to area wildlife and their displeasure of looking at chain link fences.

There is a residential subdivision on Dutton Road just northwest of the proposed solar facility. Residents have stated that Dutton Road and E. Goodenow Road are the gateway to their residential community. They do not want the solar farm to be the first thing people see when they come down Dutton Road.

The vote at the Planning & Zoning Commission was 3-1 thereby rendering a recommendation of denial.

Laurie Summers stated she is totally in favor of the solar farms. When she looked at the plan for this particular solar farm visibility was an issue for her. There is a hill to the east. This will block the view coming from the east. For that reason Laurie stated she will be voting no on this one.

Judy Ogalla said like she has said before there is a lot of discussion they need to have and this is one thing they need to have discussion on. Things such as what is the feasibility? How many of these are we going to approve? Board Member Ogalla asked do you anticipate any of these solar farms that don't get approved for the incentives moving forward anyway?

Samantha said if they do not get incentives they do not get built. If ComEd doesn't approve it then they really don't get built. Because ComEd has to approve it and connect otherwise you cannot tap into their lines. That's ComEd owned infrastructure.

Judy Ogalla asked Samantha when these solar applications come to us do we know at the time if they have interconnection agreement approval from ComEd or not?

Samantha said usually they are in process when they come to us because ComEd is slammed with these applications. They need that special use in order to apply for the incentive.

Judy asked when ComEd does approve these interconnection agreements how do we know whether they've been approved or not?

Samantha said that is something we can ask ComEd or the developer to share with us.

Judy asked Samantha to look into that and get back to them next month as to what ComEd's response is for that.

Denise Winfrey asked will we get a chance to add additional requirement for landscaping at a later date if we feel that is necessary say at the corner?

Samantha said if it doesn't get approved here it probably won't be coming back.

Richard VanHattem stated he lives at 27115 Dutton Road. He is not opposed to solar. He thinks staff is doing a great job. He is objecting to the location of this particular solar farm. There are six other homes on that street and they are all concerned about what this is going to do to their property values.

Mr. VanHattem said this facility is at the gateway to their homes. It is the only way in not just for their homes but for the Forest Preserve as well. He is concerned about safety getting in and out of that street. He is also concerned about runoff and harmful effects on wildlife in the area.

Bill Luebe objected to the proximity of the facility to the Forest Preserve. Mr. Luebe asked how far is the setback from the facility to the street on Dutton Road? The plan talks about having a seven foot (7') high fence with bushes three feet (3') tall every five feet (5') and then every twenty-five feet (25') and evergreen tree that's five feet (5') tall. Mr. Luebe said he'd be dead before they every cover up that fence for the rate of growth they're anticipating.

Bill Luebe also expressed concerns about his property flooding and cause a decrease in property values.

Jessica Gal addressed Mr. Luebe's question regarding setback on Dutton Road. According to the Will County Zoning Ordinance the minimum fence height permitted in agricultural districts is five feet (5'). Anything greater than five feet (5') has to be setback one hundred feet (100') from the centerline of the road. This is to ensure safe ingress and egress.

Jonathan Roberts responded to the objectors concerns regarding drainage. They intend to have complete vegetative coverage of the entire site in a fashion that will meet or exceed the ground coverage that exists from row crop agriculture with corn or soybeans. With the native prairie plantings they will have on the site they will have a deeper root structure and ultimately less runoff both during and after construction and for the duration of the life of the system.

Chairman Weigel said what about the visibility at the intersection?

Mr. Roberts said in terms of visibility of course we will fully comply with all the setbacks Jessica just mentioned and he believes they put them in the site plan they included.

Along the seven foot (7') fence a vegetative screening is required. They have evergreens interspersed with shrubbery. The shrubberies have a minimum of three feet (3') in height and the evergreens have a minimum height of five foot (5') at time of planting.

Chairman Weigel asked staff does our Stormwater Ordinance come into play here? Are they required to have detention?

Brian Radner stated the Chief Subdivision Engineer has researched the matter and most likely detention will not be needed unless there is over 25,000 feet of impervious surfaces such as gravel, buildings and so forth added to the site. So we will not be looking for detention at the site.

Judy Ogalla talked to the objectors and told them their concerns are all quite similar to all the property owners that live near the solar farms they have been considering. Mrs. Ogalla said she is part of the Will County Farm Bureau's Governmental Affairs Committee and she was down at an annual session they had with regard to farming with solar, wind, pipelines, all these things that are not part of our regular agricultural community. She and her husband own 160 acres of which about 30 acres they farm.

Board Member Ogalla said she is not anti-solar or pro-solar. Her thing is making sure the residents are treated fairly, that a landowner that has signed an agreement with them, as well as the surrounding landowners. Mrs. Ogalla asked her Committee to stop it until they had an ag-mitigation agreement, a de- commissioning plan. Things like that. The Land Use staff have adopted the Farm Bureau's Ag-Mitigation Plan. That means the solar farm developer has to do a study of the complete drain tile system and they have to put in new drain tiles so no water will be coming off of the property and drain onto property lower than it.

Mrs. Ogalla said these are all things that we have made them do. In addition to that, they have to hire an ag specialist/consultant to be part of their plan in everything. This person would be on site when they are doing the development to make sure this does happen. She talked about Bob Jankowski who is a conservation specialist and has provided us with suggestions for the best plantings possible to keep the soils safe and absorb most of the moisture and prevent a lot of water from running off.

Judy Ogalla said she has been saying they need as a group to come together and have a conversation about how many of these do we want to have. She knows that Crete has decided they do not want any more then five of these. The question is how many do we want to approve for an area? She thinks we aught to have ComEd come here so they can have this discussion publicly. Judy talked about ComEd stating they had about 450 of these applications state wide and of those only about 60 of them would actually get the incentives. So she feels they need a standard to be fair to everybody because how can they approve one and not the other so they need to have something on the board they can all agree to.

Denise Winfrey asked Laura Summers if the 100 foot setback met her needs?

Laura Summers said my issue is with the safety thing.

Steve Balich agreed with Judy Ogalla. Mr. Balich thinks we should look at the impact on the region.

Debbie Militello talked about a farmer planting corn they plant right up to the street. Debbie Militello suggested the Committee table this until everybody has a chance to go back and talk about this in their caucuses and discuss the density issue otherwise this is just going to keep coming up.

5. Motion to table Zoning Case ZC-18-043.

Roll Call Vote: Ogalla, Balich, Militello, Summers and Ferry voted "yes." Winfrey and Weigel voted "no." Zoning Case ZC-18-043 was tabled with a vote of 5-2.

Result: Approved [5 To 2]

Mover: Debbie Militello, District 6 (R - Channahon)

Seconder: Judy Ogalla, Vice Chair

Ayes: Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Militello

Nays: Weigel, Winfrey

6. Ordinance Amending the Will County, Illinois Zoning Ordinance Adopted and Approved September 9, 1947 as Amended for Zoning Case ZC-18-044, James and Judy Zappia, Owners of Record, Jonathan Roberts of Soltage, LLC, Agent; Bryan Keyt of Bryan Cave, Attorney, Requesting (S-18-018) Special Use Permit for a Major Public Utility, a Solar Farm, for PIN #21-14-28-400-021-0000, in Monee Township, Commonly Known as Vacant Property on South Will Center Road, Monee, IL

(Janine Farrell)

Zoning Case ZC-18-044 was announced.

Staff member Janine Farrell presented the request. This case concerns a request for a 2 megawatt solar farm facility on a 21.4 acre parcel located on S. Will Center Road, Monee, Illinois.

The owners are James and Judy Zappia. Their agent is Jonathan Roberts of Soltage, LLC. The attorney is Bryan Keyt of Bryan Cave.

There were no objectors at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. There were no objections from any of the agencies notified.

The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the special use permit with ten (10) staff recommended conditions.

Judy Ogalla is familiar with this property. It's very close to her house. It's a good choice for solar because it's not a very good ag producing property. People that have farmed that particular parcel in the past have had low production. She doesn't like when we have solar proposed for properties with a high LESA score and prime agriculture. The 100 foot setback should give good visibility because that is a very busy intersection there. That property is high so we want to make sure that drainage is totally looked at and the ag specialist is on during the entire process of that.

7. Motion to add infrastructure as required by ComEd.

The motion carried unanimously 7-0.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Debbie Militello, District 6 (R - Channahon)

Seconder: Laurie Summers, Member

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

8. Motion to approve as amended.

The motion carried unanimously 7-0.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Steve Balich, Member

Seconder: Debbie Militello, District 6 (R - Channahon)

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

V. Other Business

1. Amending Sections 155-9.130 (3) and 155-10.10 (11) - (Accessory Uses) of the Will County Zoning Ordinance- Use of Cargo Containers

(Colin Duesing)

The Chairman called for a five minute break.

Colin Duesing opened discussion of Zoning Ordinance amendments for using cargo containers as residential dwelling units. It has been looked at in various locations within the US such as Vegas, San Francisco, Wichita, Kansas and Tulsa, Oklahoma.

A cargo container is being looked at as a building material. There would need to be architectural guidelines within the Code. All the structural integrity would then go through the Building Code.

The change being considered involves the Zoning Code and the change would be to allow them as a special use in any district subject to the Building Ordinance.

Then have stick built facades to give them that architectural distinction. If being used for residential use to have some sort of peaked or pitched roof.

A list of acceptable building materials and unacceptable building materials such as plywood were displayed. Examples of unacceptable dwelling units were also presented.

Illustrations of a pitched roof and acceptable architectural siding were displayed.

Considerations to be discussed include the number of cargo containers to be used in the dwelling unit, the size of those cargo containers, the configuration of the containers and the overall size of the entire dwelling unit.

Steve Balich said when he was in Tucson they have them all over the place and they didn't have a problem with them. Mr. Balich said you need to take these on an individual basis. It depends where you're putting them.

Denise Winfrey said she would think lot size requirements in our Zoning Ordinance would come into play regarding the zoning district.

Staff indicated that it would. Right now cargo containers are not permitted for residential use or any other accessory use other than storage.

Mr. Balich asked do you have a height requirement?

Colin said it would be what the Zoning Ordinance says for any other structure.

Steve Balich asked is there a rule against having them straight up and down?

Colin said yes. I have seen that in my research. At a forty-five degree angle where somebody tried to use it as a skylight.

Mr. Balich said that's something they should look at but he doesn't have a problem with it.

Debbie Militello asked Rhonda Novak how would these be taxed?

Steve Balich said these aren't movable so he would think like a house.

Colin asked Chairman Weigel should I continue to pursue this and come back with more finite language?

Chairman Weigel said yes. You can pursue this further and come back next month.

2. Amending Sections 155-7.30 and 155-18.20 of the Will County Zoning Ordinance - Accessory Uses – Auto Salvage

(Colin Duesing)

Staff noted there was an error when they were updating our Zoning Ordinance. They left out auto re-builders in our use chart. Staff came in with a proposal of having it as a permitted use in our "I" districts and a special use in our "I-3" districts.

At the public hearing and through other meetings internally they decided to make it similar to motor vehicle repair which is also a permitted use in the C-3 and C-4 districts. The Planning & Zoning Commission concurred with that recommendation.

Staff requested the Committee recommend approval to the County Board.

3. Motion recommending approval of the proposed Text Amendments regarding auto salvage.

The motion carried unanimously 7-0.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Steve Balich, Member

Seconder: Denise E. Winfrey, Member

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

4. Will County Building Plumbing Code vs State Plumbing Code

(Brian Radner)

Brian Radner stated at last month's Committee meeting he asked the Committee members to submit any topics that they want to look at further for the Plumbing Code to see if any exemptions may be possible from requiring a building permit.

In the memo Brian outlined nine (9) topic areas he received from County Board Member Balich. He did not receive any comments from any other Committee members.

Brian asked the Committee members if they had anything to add to the list. He also wanted to know if they wanted him to pursue this further.

Committee members had received the list and read them.

Brian noted the items they are discussing pertain to residential where you're doing the work in your own home.

The Chairman asked does anybody want to add to the list or take away from the list?

The Committee was fine with it.

Brian said they would investigate and bring some language forward that would address the matter. If there is a situation that conflicts with State Law then they will identify that.

The Chairman thanked staff.

VI. Reports, Communications, Correspondence

1. Chairman, Will County Land Use and Development Committee

2. Committee Members, Will County Land Use and Development Committee

3. Director, Will County Land Use Department

4. Other

5. Public Comment

VII. Executive Session

VIII. Adjournment

1. Motion to adjourn the meeting.

The motion carried unanimously.

The meeting was adjourned at 11:55 am.

Result: Approved [Unanimous]

Mover: Steve Balich, Member

Seconder: Judy Ogalla, Vice Chair

Ayes: Weigel, Ogalla, Balich, Ferry, Summers, Winfrey, Militello

IX. Next Meeting - Will Take Place On October 9, 2018

https://willcountyil.iqm2.com/Citizens/FileOpen.aspx?Type=15&ID=3077&Inline=True

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate